The Dinosaur Toy Forum: Version 1 Archive
« Lets post dinosaur size comparison charts »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 19, 2013, 1:17pm



The Dinosaur Toy Forum has moved:

The Dinosaur Toy Forum: Version 2

Feel free to browse through five years of dino-discussion here in the Version 1 Archive! And then join in the ongoing discussion at The Dinosaur Toy Forum: Version 2

Newly listed dinosaurs (eBay.com) (eBay.co.uk) (eBay.de)




The Dinosaur Toy Forum: Version 1 Archive :: Dinosaurs and palaeontology :: Dinosaurs :: Lets post dinosaur size comparison charts
« Page 5 of 5 Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: Lets post dinosaur size comparison charts (Read 4,184 times)
Horridus
Ultimate Member
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

@Mhorridus / Dacht jij dat de dinosauriërs uitgestorven waren?



Joined: Aug 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,449
Location: UK
 Re: Lets post dinosaur size comparison charts
« Reply #80 on Mar 10, 2011, 5:56pm »

Eriorguez: what's the conensus these days re Stygimoloch being sunk into Pachycephalosaurus? Would it become its own species, ie. P. spinifer? (I really need to sign up to the DML. Will do today or tomorrow I think.)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

All you need is love...in the time of chasmosaurs http://chasmosaurs.blogspot.com/

Oct 27, 2011, 4:40am, himmapaan wrote:
Flippin' eck...
Griffin
Ultimate Member
*****
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Aug 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,929
Location: New Jersey
 Re: Lets post dinosaur size comparison charts
« Reply #81 on Mar 10, 2011, 6:11pm »

I thought the skull on dracorex was of an adult animal they concluded?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
eriorguez
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 90
 Re: Lets post dinosaur size comparison charts
« Reply #82 on Mar 10, 2011, 9:17pm »

The original paper. ALL subsecuent studies have disagreed with that.

The consensus for Stygimoloch is "needs more data". We know that it is very close to Pachycephalosaurus, that a fully grown specimen would be very Pachycephalosaur-like, and that a Pachycephalosaurus in the same growth stage as the known Stygimoloch would look remarkably like them, BUT, we need more data to go either way.

Same as Triceratops and Torosaurus; One looks like what the fully grown other would look like from what we know and vica-versa, but we need more data.

Dracorex looks just like a smaller, younger Stygimoloch without a dome. That dome could be grown. Same with Homalocephale and Prenocephale, that one is even more widely accepted, mostly from the description of both of them being on the same paper, and Bakker not being obnoxious about it.

Plus, there is a large bias torwards splitting taxa. It is all a subjective matter, but still, ontological issues are ontological issues.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
« Page 5 of 5 Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile