|
|
Post by mihnea on Jul 20, 2011 7:05:51 GMT
|
|
k907
Full Member
Posts: 100
|
Post by k907 on Jul 20, 2011 9:57:26 GMT
I'm so glad the Cadobrosaurus (my fav. cryptid) footage is finally going to be shown! And since I live in AK, I hope someday I will encounter Caddy lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Jul 20, 2011 13:06:08 GMT
Wow. The fact that the article references the dead raccoon of Montauk, I think we know where this will go.
|
|
|
|
Post by DinoLord on Jul 20, 2011 13:19:53 GMT
This looks shopped. I can tell by some of the pixels and from having seen quite a few shops in my time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horridus on Jul 20, 2011 15:41:14 GMT
A guy quoted in the Daily Fail's article about this said that it had to be a marine reptile or mammal as it moved its spine up-and-down (vertically) to swim. Apparently he knows nothing about any marine reptiles, ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by mihnea on Jul 20, 2011 19:07:04 GMT
We can call it another mighty hoax? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Jul 20, 2011 21:37:43 GMT
is there a video of it? The image on that article wont work for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by paleoferroequine on Jul 20, 2011 22:07:15 GMT
is there a video of it? The image on that article wont work for me. Well, Discovery network had a show on Tuesday about this. Needless to say I didn't watch it.  Alaskan Monster Hunt: Hillstranded Capts. Johnathan and Andy Hillstrand from ``Deadliest Catch'' begin an Alaskan adventure to search for answers to the mysteries of the Bering Sea monster and the legendary Cadborosaurus. You might be able to stream it from Discovery channel. There is video, but I'm not sure where, Youtube? Ah, just checked and it is. Look under Alaskan Monster Hunt: Hillstranded. 3 parts. |
|
k907
Full Member
Posts: 100
|
Post by k907 on Jul 20, 2011 22:55:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Seijun on Jul 20, 2011 23:00:17 GMT
Doesn't alaska have whales?
|
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Jul 20, 2011 23:51:08 GMT
Did you honestly expect something worthwhile and definitive? |
|
k907
Full Member
Posts: 100
|
Post by k907 on Jul 20, 2011 23:55:24 GMT
Doesn't alaska have whales? Yes we do! |
|
k907
Full Member
Posts: 100
|
Post by k907 on Jul 20, 2011 23:57:12 GMT
Did you honestly expect something worthwhile and definitive? Well there was so much hype last year on it, that yeah I expected something more but whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Jul 21, 2011 0:25:42 GMT
Did you honestly expect something worthwhile and definitive? Well there was so much hype last year on it, that yeah I expected something more but whatever. The way I see it, if something big and real is actually found, be it Sasquatch, nessie, living megalodon, or whatever, it will not be revealed via carefully edited hype program, because the news would be huge and someone would be studying it for real. Speaking of which, anyone ever hear about the 'ground breaking' information that would change everything we know about megalodon?  |
|
|
|
Post by zopteryx on Jul 25, 2011 2:34:47 GMT
I thought that "monster" in Alaska ended up being a White Sturgeon, or am I thinking of the wrong monster?
|
|
camara
Junior Member
Posts: 83
|
Post by camara on Jul 25, 2011 10:52:37 GMT
That show was the most stupid and ridiculous thing I have seen in a while...are you really giving some credit to that stupid tv show???
|
|
bfler
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by bfler on Jul 25, 2011 11:06:38 GMT
If there is really some big unknown creature on the world I would feel sorry for it because after the discovery, at the end it would rot as attraction in some sort of zoo or they would kill it if somebody recognizes that it could be a threat for people.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinoguy2 on Jul 26, 2011 22:45:36 GMT
If there is really some big unknown creature on the world I would feel sorry for it because after the discovery, at the end it would rot as attraction in some sort of zoo or they would kill it if somebody recognizes that it could be a threat for people. If it had gone unnoticed for so long it would probably be better off in a zoo at first so they could bolster the numbers for a viable population. If it's gone unnoticed for so long, how could it possibly be seen as a threat? |
|
|
|
Post by gwangi on Jul 27, 2011 0:15:29 GMT
If it had gone unnoticed for so long it would probably be better off in a zoo at first so they could bolster the numbers for a viable population. I have to disagree with this. Such an undertaking would require the removal of specimens from the wild with no knowledge of how to care for them or if they would even survive captivity. If it has gone this long unnoticed it is probably best to leave it alone. This I totally agree with. |
|
bfler
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by bfler on Jul 27, 2011 9:04:05 GMT
If there is really some big unknown creature on the world I would feel sorry for it because after the discovery, at the end it would rot as attraction in some sort of zoo or they would kill it if somebody recognizes that it could be a threat for people. If it had gone unnoticed for so long it would probably be better off in a zoo at first so they could bolster the numbers for a viable population. If it's gone unnoticed for so long, how could it possibly be seen as a threat? How would you feel if you have to live in a prison permanently observed by a sensational crowd? Go into a zoo and look at the animals. They are only shadows of their wild relatives because in many cases their will has been broken. And in the second case the step between the sweet, useful animal an the beast is very small. There are enough examples: Say a family dog. At first it is the beloved animal, then someone provokates it so that it hurts a person. And very often the result is that it has to lose the life. It is not for nothing that we live in the period of the sixth great extinction event, but the first that isn't caused by nature. |
|
