|
Post by webdragon on Sept 3, 2008 0:53:47 GMT
To anyone who owns a Battat Euplocephalus, I have an interesting anomaly to note! I was just drooling over my new one (thanks again Therizinosaurus!!!) and noticed that underneath where all of the printing is, it's stamped BATTA, not BATTAT. I've checked all of my other models and this is the only one I can find with the erroneous stamp. Does anyone else have a figure like this?
|
|
|
Post by tomhet on Sept 3, 2008 2:34:28 GMT
BATTAT is written on mine
|
|
|
Post by webdragon on Sept 3, 2008 17:38:20 GMT
Ooh, curious! I'm pretty sure it's not lost in a skin fold or something, the extra T isn't there. I'll have to shoot a picture of it when I get a moment!
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on Sept 3, 2008 21:18:44 GMT
;D Maybe that mistake will make it extra valuable.
|
|
|
Post by chrisw on Sept 3, 2008 22:07:26 GMT
Mine clearly says "BATTAT" as well.
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Sept 5, 2008 21:02:35 GMT
I have 2 that say Battat, 1 that says Batta, and one that is illegible.
|
|
|
Post by Tyrannax on Sept 5, 2008 23:53:18 GMT
My Battat T-Rex has nothing stamped on it, but my acro and styracosaurus have BATTAT
|
|
|
Post by bokisaurus on Sept 6, 2008 1:09:31 GMT
All of mine have Battat stamped except 2 that say Batta. On closer inspection, my other euplo's skin did obscure the T. You can barely see it in the skin folds.
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on Sept 6, 2008 2:17:20 GMT
;D If your Battat T-Rex doesn't have Battat stamped on it then it is a fake. J/K ;D
|
|