|
Post by razh00 on Aug 1, 2011 20:39:05 GMT
Hey guys,
Ive decided to start a mammals series for shapeways and id like to hear your suggestions ;D
Thanks
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on Aug 1, 2011 22:26:41 GMT
Hey guys, Ive decided to start a mammals series for shapeways and id like to hear your suggestions ;D Thanks Do you know what scale you will be using?
|
|
|
Post by Seijun on Aug 1, 2011 22:29:01 GMT
I would like to see some of the more exotic prehistoric ungulate species, or giraffe relatives.
|
|
|
Post by ikessauro on Aug 1, 2011 22:50:08 GMT
You got to do some ungulates for sure. I'd like very much some of the more obscure species, like Deinotherium (the only good one is far too rare and expensive). Moeritherium, Uintatherium, Diprotodon, Embolotherium would be cool choices too.
|
|
|
Post by Radman on Aug 1, 2011 22:58:54 GMT
Check out the Acheson Creations Deinotherium on my custom paints page, it's not too bad, the model, that is, not my paint job . I think he may eventually make a pair, so maybe a female to match this one. Good value, actually. I wouldn't mind seeing a Moropus or Toxodon, either.
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Aug 1, 2011 23:00:33 GMT
Let's see some less-common carnivores--Hemipsalodon, Megistotherium, Pachycrocuta, Chasmaporthetes, Osteoborus, Homotherium, Daphoneus, Amphicyon, Epicyon, Kanuites, Oxyaena, Sarkastodon, Mesonyx...
I'll stop there.
Also, the various archaeocete whales would be cool.
|
|
|
Post by paleoferroequine on Aug 1, 2011 23:05:11 GMT
Good idea! If 1/40 scale the mammals could be kept smaller. A good one for use with late Cretaceous dinos would be Didelphodon a 3 ft long(with tail)stagodont marsupial. Oh, I could go on and on.... various creodonts, early horses, rhinos, nimravids, condylarths, early land cetaceans such as Ambulocetus , Pakicetus, and later water dwelling such as Kutchicetus , and early proboscidea. These would all be fairly small and if you wanted bigger they could also be made in 1/20 scale. This only scratches the surface! ;D
|
|
|
Post by mmfrankford on Aug 2, 2011 10:30:55 GMT
I would love a glyptodon and the marsupial carnivores.
|
|
|
Post by jhudstone on Aug 2, 2011 14:25:51 GMT
Synthetoceras, Thylacosmilus, Alticamelus, Diprotodon, and Procoptodon are a few I would like to see.
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Aug 2, 2011 14:42:32 GMT
Synthetoceras, Thylacosmilus, Alticamelus, Diprotodon, and Procoptodon are a few I would like to see. We should add Borhyaena to the odd marsupials too!
|
|
|
Post by sepp on Aug 2, 2011 19:32:28 GMT
I'd love to see any prehistoric whales, they're so fascinating. While Basilosaurus has been done before, I'd like to see the land dwelling whale ancestors and maybe a Livyatan...
Also some creodonts, like Sinopa rapax (do it!) or Sinopa grangeri, Patriofelis, Hyaenodon, Tritemnodon, Sarkastodon, etc....
|
|
|
Post by razh00 on Aug 3, 2011 18:10:13 GMT
Thanks for all suggestions, ill try to make more of them even it takes years XD
I will start with Embolotherium
and for the scale I have thought about 1/56 for the bigger ones, and a bigger scale for smaler species ¿what do you think?
|
|
|
Post by paleoferroequine on Aug 3, 2011 20:07:50 GMT
Thanks for all suggestions, ill try to make more of them even it takes years XD I will start with Embolotherium and for the scale I have thought about 1/56 for the bigger ones, and a bigger scale for smaler species ¿what do you think? The scale is about right even if it doesn't match others. Embolotherium is one of my favorites, however newer research has changed the appearance. There are several species, the most common being E. andrewsi and E. grangeri. This article at the American Museum of Natural History is good. Read it please! ;D And remember four toes on the front and three on back. research.amnh.org/paleontology/perissodactyl/node/12If you can find it this will have everything on brototheriidae: SPECIES TAXONOMY, PHYLOGENY, AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE BRONTOTHERIIDAE (MAMMALIA: PERISSODACTYLA) MATTHEW C. MIHLBACHLER Division of Paleontology American Museum of Natural History The animal portrayed in Primeval and Walking with monsters is probably not correct. Not Correct! This is my version which is a bit better but not perfect. The hair is artistic license.
|
|
|
Post by stormnl on Aug 3, 2011 20:45:50 GMT
wow that's a nice species
i like it
bring it in production
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Aug 3, 2011 22:05:48 GMT
Thanks for all suggestions, ill try to make more of them even it takes years XD I will start with Embolotherium and for the scale I have thought about 1/56 for the bigger ones, and a bigger scale for smaler species ¿what do you think? The scale is about right even if it doesn't match others. Embolotherium is one of my favorites, however newer research has changed the appearance. There are several species, the most common being E. andrewsi and E. grangeri. This article at the American Museum of Natural History is good. Read it please! ;D And remember four toes on the front and three on back. research.amnh.org/paleontology/perissodactyl/node/12If you can find it this will have everything on brototheriidae: SPECIES TAXONOMY, PHYLOGENY, AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE BRONTOTHERIIDAE (MAMMALIA: PERISSODACTYLA) MATTHEW C. MIHLBACHLER Division of Paleontology American Museum of Natural History The animal portrayed in Primeval and Walking with monsters is probably not correct. Not Correct! This is my version which is a bit better but not perfect. The hair is artistic license. Your version is according to exactly one researcher, and judging from morphology of other brontotheres (for which a similar morphology would be impossible), the reconstruction is dubious.
|
|
|
Post by razh00 on Aug 4, 2011 14:01:39 GMT
I have a problem now.... the article looked right for me (thanks for all that information paleoferroequine. its really a pleasure to make a model with some good information), but my knowledge is nule. so now i dont know what reconstruction is the most accurate.
please help!
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Aug 4, 2011 14:15:34 GMT
I have a problem now.... the article looked right for me (thanks for all that information paleoferroequine. its really a pleasure to make a model with some good information), but my knowledge is nule. so now i dont know what reconstruction is the most accurate. please help! You could do either--if you go with the more recent reconstruction, you might not find it as popular. Perhaps one of the different brontotheres instead--there is a species of Megacerops where the largest ones have two ridiculously long horns on the nose, which then branch again. There are only three known specimens (2 from Saskatchewan, 1 f mSouth Dakota, I think). Essentially, like this: but much longer--and at the ends, the core flares out into a v-shaped fan. I can't actually find any photos of it. I do know that the structure of the skull would not allow for it to be filled in like on the Embolotherium reconstruction.
|
|
|
Post by paleoferroequine on Aug 4, 2011 20:30:13 GMT
Perhaps one of the different brontotheres instead--there is a species of Megacerops where the largest ones have two ridiculously long horns on the nose, which then branch again. There are only three known specimens (2 from Saskatchewan, 1 f mSouth Dakota, I think). That would be Megacerops kuwagatarhinus. The type specimen is from Montana. I don't know the size of it though.
|
|
|
Post by razh00 on Aug 21, 2011 19:58:12 GMT
Here is my first mamal!!! I finally used paleoferroequine suggested reconstruction. Hope you like it.
|
|
|
Post by bokisaurus on Aug 21, 2011 20:28:30 GMT
I love it! CAn't wait till its available for order Some of those weird early giraffe such as sivatherium would be cool,too
|
|