|
Post by stoneage on Nov 12, 2008 17:51:58 GMT
Do scientists even investigate? Do they look for, say, claw markings? Or do they just conclude the research and say its footprints? I'm going to read the rest of that article... That's how they found the 'prints' were suspect. Geologists found them, wrote a press release, and assumed they were dino prints. Actual dinosaur experts check them out, and said, probably not, pending further study. ;D Not only did the Geologist assume they were dino prints, but they assumed they were made by 4 different species of Dinosaur. How on earth did they come up with that conclusion? ;D
|
|
|
Post by tetonbabydoll on Nov 12, 2008 19:05:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Nov 12, 2008 20:27:06 GMT
There is a reason many of us were sceptical as soon as we saw the pictures. So the question becomes--where are the tracks of dragging sauropod tails?
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Nov 12, 2008 21:56:17 GMT
I was wondering that too.
|
|