|
Post by EmperorDinobot on Aug 10, 2008 4:55:26 GMT
That's just reiterating your opinion, not explaining it. Reconstructions of Iguanodon haven't changed much since the 1980s, IMHO. Who says Iguanodon was incapable of standing bipedally, even if it did most of its walking quadrupedally? It's not just an opinion. Just look at him. He is outdated. Sure Iguanodon could get up on two legs, but this one's tail is bent when Iguanodon's spine wasn't as flexible due to the ossified rods on its spines, from the back to the tail. Its spine was held straight, and the anterior part slung a bit lower than it is represented in the Carnegie Iguanodon.
|
|
|
Post by sid on Aug 10, 2008 11:11:13 GMT
Bah...I still believe the Carnegie Iguanodon is NOT outdated The bipedal stance the figure portrays is realistic,plus,you must remember,ossified tendons or not,that animals are REALLY flexible,they are not a stiff bunch of sticks glued togheter or some stuff like that ;D
|
|
|
Post by Blade-of-the-Moon on Aug 10, 2008 11:21:54 GMT
I wouldn't mind seeing a Nothosaurus by anyone...and anything Papo makes is going to be popular...though a Carno, Acro, Dilo or a sauropod by them would be excellent.
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on Aug 10, 2008 18:22:52 GMT
I always liked that one though it seems a little undersized.
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on Aug 10, 2008 18:55:01 GMT
I was talking about the schleich Iguanodon above.
|
|
|
Post by tomhet on Aug 10, 2008 20:30:25 GMT
^^^ You only had to modify your previous post
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on Aug 10, 2008 20:39:36 GMT
I see Tomhet, I'll have to try and remember that the next time I mess up. So much to learn.
|
|