|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Mar 7, 2009 2:43:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyrannax on Mar 7, 2009 3:02:16 GMT
I enjoyed the 2nd and 3rd one. The 2nd may be one of my favorites from you.  |
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Mar 7, 2009 3:04:00 GMT
I find the light patches and photoshopping on them appalling.  But I guess it's good if you like them.  |
|
|
|
Post by Tyrannax on Mar 7, 2009 3:05:07 GMT
I do. I really enjoyed the Baryonyx one too! The first one looks eerie. |
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Mar 7, 2009 3:11:16 GMT
I thought they all sucked.  |
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Mar 7, 2009 3:12:15 GMT
I actually like them to be honest. |
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Mar 7, 2009 3:13:00 GMT
What do you like about them? |
|
|
|
Post by Tyrannax on Mar 7, 2009 3:18:39 GMT
They seem to be...how do I put this...mellow.
They look natural.
It really si hard to explain. Not overloaded with Photoshopped qualities.
|
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Mar 7, 2009 3:24:04 GMT
Look at the second one. Very loaded with photoshop qualities. |
|
|
|
Post by Tyrannax on Mar 7, 2009 3:27:43 GMT
Not too noticeable though. They may have even aided the diorama.
|
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Mar 7, 2009 3:28:20 GMT
Look at the fins on the plesio. |
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Mar 7, 2009 3:29:12 GMT
I like the reflection of the tree in the water, it adds a new layer of nature.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyrannax on Mar 7, 2009 3:30:15 GMT
^ That may indeed be what is catching my eye. I noticed the fin. It looks good IMHO. |
|
|
|
Post by richard on Mar 16, 2009 16:00:22 GMT
the third one did work
|
|
|
|
Post by fossil on May 9, 2010 17:54:34 GMT
I liked them all, cordy...the third in particular. In that one the reflected trees lent credence to a freshwater oxbow or other stillish water body, perfect for Baryonyx. Where did you get the fish? One of my great needs in my dioramas is for small fish (you wouldn't credit the number of gaping-mawed pterosaurs, marine/estuarian reptiles, and prehistoric amphibia I have, all clamoring for their piscine provender in my layouts)! I actually purchased the large Chap-Mei adventure set featuring a giant Plesiosaur and smaller Ichthyosaur, as well as the requisite throw-away human and capture(green-titled "rescue") gear, merely to get my mitts on the three small fish that were included in the box! Ten bucks (Toys-R-Us closeout) for three tiny fish; am I crazy or what? Now I find I can't even use them, because I'm being informed on all sides that the box -- complete and unviolated -- is worth far more in intact condition than I originally paid for it, so I'm back to square one, only poorer.
|
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on May 9, 2010 21:53:54 GMT
I wouldn't listen to anybody who says that the elasmosaur playset is worth a lot - maybe they are worth $15 in-store, and there's still plenty of them in the toys-r-us stores near me!
I got the fish out of that very playset - I think they are tuna!
|
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on May 9, 2010 22:03:12 GMT
The third one is pretty good.
|
|
|
|
Post by rugops on May 9, 2010 22:48:40 GMT
I really liked the first one. It had a feel to it like there is somthing new in the water other than crocs to worry about. |
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on May 10, 2010 23:58:31 GMT
Your failures are amazing!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gorgonopsid on Jun 6, 2010 4:39:54 GMT
I like the first one. ;D What dino toy is in the first one?
|
|
![[][][]cordylus[][][] Avatar](http://files.sharenator.com/Troll_Face_U_MAD_RE_wrestling_1-s407x405-126802.jpg)
