|
|
Post by Horridus on Sept 6, 2010 9:40:38 GMT
That guy's art is very Marshall-esque - I like it. |
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Sept 6, 2010 14:52:38 GMT
I think Dan has some in his new avatar and signature Not even close. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by mightyjptrex on Sept 6, 2010 15:23:37 GMT
Yep looks nothing like it. Its a light green and tan mix with some blue mixed in. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Sept 6, 2010 16:30:57 GMT
Yep looks nothing like it. Its a light green and tan mix with some blue mixed in. ;D Sounds neat. Do you have any pics of the forest rogers sculpt you are allowed to share mightyjp? |
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Sept 6, 2010 16:52:51 GMT
Yep looks nothing like it. Its a light green and tan mix with some blue mixed in. ;D Sounds neat. Do you have any pics of the forest rogers sculpt you are allowed to share mightyjp? Anything that can be shared of the sculpts will be here: forestrogers.squarespace.com/carnegie-dinosaurs/ |
|
|
|
Post by Himmapaan on Sept 6, 2010 17:00:22 GMT
*Slaps Forehead* I know Forest Rogers' work. I never realised she sculpted the Carnegie dinosaurs. For shame.
|
|
|
|
Post by john2xtheman on Sept 6, 2010 18:32:10 GMT
We will all get to see them in due time. ;D I wonder,is the Edmontosaurus (Wild Safari) going to be the around 30 foot long E. annectens like the one on display at the Smithsonian (formally known as Anatosaurus) or the 40 foot E. regalis? (I would like to see either one) ;D |
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Sept 6, 2010 19:08:36 GMT
We will all get to see them in due time. ;D I wonder,is the Edmontosaurus (Wild Safari) going to be the around 30 foot long E. annectens like the one on display at the Smithsonian (formally known as Anatosaurus) or the 40 foot E. regalis? (I would like to see either one) ;D I guess it will depend on what you put it next to...scale is a funny thing. |
|
|
|
Post by mightyjptrex on Sept 6, 2010 19:43:41 GMT
Yes I have pictures.
No I cant share them.
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by tanystropheus on Sept 7, 2010 1:07:47 GMT
Miragaia !!
WS "almost" had a solid family of Stegosauridae in their collection. The Miragaia should be stunning based on what I'm hearing on the boards, and their Stegosaurus is also well done. However, why did WS botch up the Kentrosaurus' head?? ( they should have just used their signature "gold eyes"...the head sculpt looks like a demented claymation product). Too bad I never picked up the DR Kentrosaurus (perhaps the best Kentrosaurus ever made...it is more or less perfect except for the unsightly tail seams)...
Is it just me or is there an uncanny semblance between the Papo Stegosaurus and the WS Stegosaurus ( minus the paint job)?? ...similar pose, same facial expression? yes, no?
|
|
|
|
Post by Godzillasaurus on Sept 7, 2010 1:18:53 GMT
Yay!!!!! Edmontosaurus!!!! Our Tyrannosaurs finally have something to eat!!!! Miragaia stegosaurus love is strong these year's!  Kaprosuchus woohoo for Boar croc!!! |
|
|
|
Post by simon on Sept 7, 2010 1:38:45 GMT
Scale is irrelevant if you're a collector. Just 'mix and match' those displays. I have every scale from 1:70 (Japanese mini-dinos) to 1:30. That WS Edmontosaurus can easily represent the largest of the species next to the Colorata figures, for example. Just put the Miaragia and Carnotaurus in with the 1:35 scale dinosaurs and no problem!
I can't wait for this next year's releases! It sounds like Safari and WS have both mined diamonds!
|
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Sept 7, 2010 1:46:21 GMT
Scale is irrelevant if you're a collector. Just 'mix and match' those displays. I have every scale from 1:70 (Japanese mini-dinos) to 1:30. That WS Edmontosaurus can easily represent the largest of the species next to the Colorata figures, for example. Just put the Miaragia and Carnotaurus in with the 1:35 scale dinosaurs and no problem! I can't wait for this next year's releases! It sounds like Safari and WS have both mined diamonds! Sorry, but this is a pet peeve of mine--they're both Safari, not Safari and WS. Safari produces the Wild Safari and Carnegie Collection |
|
|
|
Post by tanystropheus on Sept 7, 2010 2:07:50 GMT
Scale is irrelevant if you're a collector. Just 'mix and match' those displays. I have every scale from 1:70 (Japanese mini-dinos) to 1:30. That WS Edmontosaurus can easily represent the largest of the species next to the Colorata figures, for example. Just put the Miaragia and Carnotaurus in with the 1:35 scale dinosaurs and no problem! I can't wait for this next year's releases! It sounds like Safari and WS have both mined diamonds! Sorry, but this is a pet peeve of mine--they're both Safari, not Safari and WS. Safari produces the Wild Safari and Carnegie Collection Okay, so Safari produces WS and Carnegie Collection. Does that mean we can expect some brand spanking new 2011 Carnegie dinosaur toys as well?! Is there a specific ratio between how many dinosaurs can be released across the Safari brands per year? btw, why do trees cost so much?  |
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Sept 7, 2010 2:20:34 GMT
Sorry, but this is a pet peeve of mine--they're both Safari, not Safari and WS. Safari produces the Wild Safari and Carnegie Collection Okay, so Safari produces WS and Carnegie Collection. Does that mean we can expect some brand spanking new 2011 Carnegie dinosaur toys as well?! Is there a specific ratio between how many dinosaurs can be released across the Safari brands per year? btw, why do trees cost so much? There are already Carnegie dinos announced--the Miragaia and new Carnotarus. They are in the list at the top. And WS trees aren't too bad--the existing pine tree is about $10, and the new ones are going to be roughly the same size, although there is more to them. You're probably thinking of the Schleich and CollectA trees, some of which are awesome, but yes, cost anywhere from $25 to $50. |
|
|
|
Post by Seijun on Sept 7, 2010 2:45:25 GMT
Yes I have pictures. No I cant share them. ;D You are evil. |
|
|
|
Post by tanystropheus on Sept 7, 2010 5:55:47 GMT
Oops, my bad, for some reason or another, I assumed that they were all WS... ...And you're right, I was actually thinking of the trees by Schleich. They are quite awesome, but assuming that I've had some cash-on-hand and the option to spend $25-40 on Scheich's Brachiosaurus, or some Schleich trees, the answer is painfully obvious. |
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Sept 7, 2010 12:57:57 GMT
Oops, my bad, for some reason or another, I assumed that they were all WS... ...And you're right, I was actually thinking of the trees by Schleich. They are quite awesome, but assuming that I've had some cash-on-hand and the option to spend $25-40 on Scheich's Brachiosaurus, or some Schleich trees, the answer is painfully obvious. I know, I'd take a tree any day... ;D But I just don't care for Schleich's dinosaurs.  |
|
|
|
Post by mihnea on Sept 7, 2010 15:46:17 GMT
Pictures!!!PLS!!!It's EVIL!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Sept 7, 2010 23:01:01 GMT
We can't, Safari told us not to, it's not like people are choosing to withhold pictures--they have to
|
|
![[][][]cordylus[][][] Avatar](http://files.sharenator.com/Troll_Face_U_MAD_RE_wrestling_1-s407x405-126802.jpg)
