|
|
Post by Dinotoyforum on Feb 26, 2011 21:00:29 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by lio99 on Feb 26, 2011 21:05:48 GMT
Cool thank's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Feb 26, 2011 21:06:23 GMT
Always happy to see a new paleo-blog.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horridus on Feb 26, 2011 21:17:45 GMT
Always happy to see a new paleo-blog. Well...an old one with a new name  By the way, I've been using 'definition 1', although mostly because I've been reading papers by Smith et al... |
|
|
|
Post by neovenator08 on Feb 26, 2011 21:24:14 GMT
Interesting read. I seperate Plesiosaurs and Pliosaurs, but that's just personal opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horridus on Feb 26, 2011 21:32:23 GMT
Interesting read. I seperate Plesiosaurs and Pliosaurs, but that's just personal opinion. So you would refer to pliosaurs as plesiosaurians rather than plesiosaurs? Peter Piper picked a....etc. |
|
|
|
Post by Dinotoyforum on Feb 26, 2011 21:50:51 GMT
In popular usage I suppose a common name for Plesiosauria isn't really a priority. Pliosaurs are Pliosaurs. Plesiosaurs are Plesiosaurs. It's simple and makes sense.
Sigh. Dinosaur workers don't have these problems. Dinosaurus the dinosaurid dinosauroid dinosaur.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horridus on Feb 26, 2011 21:57:48 GMT
I'm sorry, I just can't help it... |
|
|
|
Post by Dinotoyforum on Feb 26, 2011 22:04:04 GMT
Indeed. I'm also aware there are dinosauroids  |
|
|
|
Post by Blade-of-the-Moon on Feb 26, 2011 22:17:27 GMT
I just that film, the Hunt for China's Dinosaurs , on Youtube..Dale Russel really thought Dinosauroids was a neat idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horridus on Feb 26, 2011 22:24:53 GMT
Dale Russel really thought Dinosauroids was a neat idea. They really weren't. Who was it that said they looked "suspiciously human"...? They were right. |
|
|
|
Post by Blade-of-the-Moon on Feb 27, 2011 3:20:24 GMT
I don't recall, but beating a guy up over an idea isn't right either...and if you watch that video he doesn't think too much of it..just it's an interesting idea..and I'll give him that.
|
|
