|
|
Post by Griffin on Dec 6, 2011 14:41:30 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by fireplume on Dec 6, 2011 15:01:54 GMT
Looks interesting. I wonder what other new species were considered "rubbish"...
|
|
|
|
Post by zopteryx on Dec 6, 2011 21:45:51 GMT
I wonder what other new species were considered "rubbish"... I agree. There is probably something really incredible locked away on a museum shelf some where. To be honest though, this new genus looks rather dubious to me. It's too similar to Albertaceratops as far as I can tell. EDIT: I take that back, its horns are rather different. It almost seems to bridge the gap between Albertaceratops and Centrosaurus, just based on its horns. |
|
|
|
Post by fireplume on Dec 6, 2011 23:44:55 GMT
*Wonders what dromaeosauridae could be rubbish*
If that's what it's called, then hey, who said dumpster diving wasn't ok?
|
|
|
|
Post by dinoguy2 on Dec 7, 2011 0:05:05 GMT
Looks interesting. I wonder what other new species were considered "rubbish"... Maybe not rubbish, but I've read that a ton of bones collected during the same expeditions in Africa that gave us giraffatitan have yet to be unpacked. Nobody has had the time or energy to put effort into preparing them since the 1920s! |
|
|
|
Post by fireplume on Dec 7, 2011 0:13:41 GMT
That's a very valid point...
|
|
|
|
Post by vetrupristasaurus on Jan 25, 2012 1:33:56 GMT
i know the paleontologist who helped with this. met him in a trailer park, and he told me about it early. I never told anyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by vetrupristasaurus on Jan 25, 2012 1:34:56 GMT
He also told me abot some noasaurid that i cant remember anything about.
|
|
