more finds
dml.cmnh.org/1996Apr/msg00403.html(From our beauty correspondent)
Last night I read Larry Martin and Bruce Rothschild's classic paper
'Paleopathology and diving mosasaurs'. They suggest that _Platecarpus_, the
stocky, short-bodied mosasaur in which avascular necrosis was most common, was
a deep diver - it is interesting that skin impressions are consistent with this.
They mention smooth scales known to belong to this genus (presumably an
adaptation to reduce hydrodynamic drag). They compare this to diamond-shaped,
keeled scales known from _Tylosaurus_. Judging from the scales, _T_ wasn't as
adapted for diving, but there is evidence that it did so occasionally (fossils
of _T_ have been recovered in association with 9 m deep-water giant squid). This
isn't surprising, given that many pelagic cetaceans have been recorded diving
very deep.
> Funny you should ask. I asked Dale Russell this very question at Dinofest
> last weekend. He agreed that the so-called "crest" was displaced tracheal
> cartilege, and he was not aware of other evidence of nuchal fringes. I'd
> asked the same question of mosasaur expert Gordon Bell at the last SVP
> conference, and he said the same thing. Sounds like the mosasaurs were
> hydrodynamically sleek like orcas or seals, and weren't the scaley sea
> monsters as they are sometimes portrayed.
Artists take note! One of the exceptions to the Knightian image of mosasaurs was
Rudolph Zallinger - the mosasaur in his mural is smooth skinned and crestless.
Thanks to Gary Kerr, Tony Thulborn and Tracy Ford for refs.
> BTW, at Dinofest, Bob Bakker said that the skins of ichthyosaurs and
> plesiosaurs he's examined is completely smooth to the naked eye. Hope this
> helps.
Now this is very interesting, and brings me on to something else I've been
meaning to ask. Has Bakker published any work on marine reptiles, does he plan
to? Some of you may have noticed that I referred to the 'Pliosauridae' a while
back: I've yet to see pliosaur monophyly demonstrated without doubt (and what
I've seen so far makes me doubt it). Colin McHenry has told me that Bakker
suspects polyphyly of the group also. I'm guessing this is all through pers.
comm., but does anyone know any better?
"They are forced to call everything by long names now, because they have used
up all of the short ones, ever since they took to making 9 species out of 1"
Kingsley 1863
DARREN NAISH
www.oceansofkansas.com/images2/snowskin.jpghe remains of cartilage, particularly from the rib cage and the tympanic membrane covering the ear, are fairly commonly fossilized in mosasaur specimens. Imprints of the scales covering the skin have been found in several sets of remains. Although mosasaurs had large paddles, it is more likely that they used their strong, sinuous tails to propel themselves rapidly through the water. Recent (1995, 1997 and 1998) evidence has shown that even large Tylosaurs were attacked or scavenged by Cretoxyrhina sharks.
sso, they were sometimes sharkbait. I thought y'all would find it interesting. Here is the link.
www.oceansofkansas.com/bite.html be truthful, I never intended to do much with these left-overs from a Late Cretaceous marine predator's lunch. I had realized that they were probably the remains from some sort of feeding activity, but that is what one would expect in an depositional environment where big animals had sharp teeth and fed on other big animals. Taken individually, the specimens shown below are just collections of associated mosasaur bones, most of which appear to be badly weathered and generally unidentifiable. Over the last several months, however, it has become apparent that these remains probably share a common origin.
The shared element among all of these specimens is that they are evidence of attacks and/or feeding by a species of giant sharks during the Late Cretaceous (Latest Coniacian time, approximately 85 million years ago). The shark has been identified from the teeth that it left embedded in some of the bones as Cretoxyrhina mantelli. “Mantelli’s Cretaceous Shark” was about the same size as a modern Great White shark but was not closely related. It is also what I have come to call the “Ginsu Shark” because of its rather decisive bite.
For those of you who have not been subjected to American television commercials over the last 20 or 30 years, ‘Ginsu Knives’® were and are still being advertised as very sharp and strong, along with the catchy phase, “It slices and dices”. It seemed appropriate to apply that name to an eighteen foot shark with jaws full of sharp, blade-like teeth that seems to have ‘sliced and diced’ its meals. It has been estimated that the amount of biting force that a large shark can exert on its prey easily exceeds 10 tons per inch.
Kenshu Shimada and I first reported on a shark bitten mosasaur specimen in 1995. That material later was donated to the Sternberg Museum at Fort Hays State University and will hopefully be part of the new exhibits when the museum opens in its new quarters in March, 1999. The specimen consisted of a 12 inch section of 5 articulated vertebrae from the lower back of a large (18 foot) mosasaur. The vertebrae at each end had had been sheered completely through and there were several Cretoxyrhina teeth embedded in the bone. The bones appeared to have been partially dissolved by acid, suggesting that the shark had swallowed this large hunk of a mosasaur and then later regurgitated the indigestible bones. In this case, and others, the pieces were apparently held together by enough of the remaining skin, muscle or ligaments to reach the sea bottom. Only those portions of the mosasaur's bones that were exposed during digestion were damaged by the sharks stomach acids.
This discovery generated enough interest that Paleoworld (Wall to Wall Productions, LTD) became interested and filmed the specimen in 1997 for an upcoming episode called "Prehistoric Sharks". Kenshu Shimada also published more information about that specimen in his paper “Paleoecological Relationships of the Late Cretaceous Lamniform Shark, Cretoxyrhina mantelli (Agassiz)", Journal of Paleontology, 71(5), 1997, pp. 926-933.
While working with this specimen, I recalled that we had other ‘parts and pieces’ in our collection that also showed evidence of shark bite, digestion, and/or traumatic injury. Two other specimens included embedded Cretoxyrhina teeth. Fourteen specimens of probable shark related feeding activity have now been identified. Apparently, Cretoxyrhina was not overly awed by the mosasaur's size and ferocity, and was not particular as to what part of the mosasaur that it fed upon. For a brief period in the Western Interior Sea, giant sharks were the top predators.
Also, you can check out Jim Bourdon's "EXTINCT ELASMOBRANCH Specimens and Paleo-Faunas" site for lots of expert information about sharks and rays, as well as links to current Shark Pages around the world.
I have recently added pictures of most of these specimens on the following pages. While the photos are lacking somewhat in quality, they do adequately portray the overall impact of this feeding activity. The numbers on the drawing below provide a general idea of the locations of the recovered shark bite specimens.
Click on the thumbnail images below to see the larger pictures.
t-jaws.jpg (5041 bytes) The lower jaws and premaxillary of a 36 inch Tylosaurus sp. skull. (1) The bones from the large Tylosaur skull shown above have the tips of at least three Cretoxyrhina teeth embedded in them; one each in the outside of the left and right dentarys, and one in the premaxillary. This specimen consisted of the skull, lower jaws and several upper limb bones. Since it was badly weathered before discovery, much of the evidence of shark bites may have been lost. There are, however, several tooth marks across the muzzle (premaxillary), and the most anterior bite may have taken off a large chunk of the bone. The shark bites visible on the skull were not fatal and it is possible that this mosasaur survived this encounter with the shark, and died later of other causes.
tpremax2.jpg (2686 bytes) This picture of the premaxillary shows the location of bite marks (white arrows. From the direction of the bite marks and the location of the embedded tooth, it would appear that the shark bit from the right side of the mosasaur's head. This close up shows the location of the embedded tooth, and a groove leading toward the embedded tooth, as well as damage done to the tip of the premaxillary. It appears that the bite of the shark closed on the tip of the muzzle and cut deeply enough into the bone to shear off the end of the mosasaur's snout.
t-skull.jpg (3939 bytes) The remains of a shark bitten mosasaur skull and vertebrae. (2) This mosasaur was not so ‘lucky’. The specimen consists of numerous, almost completely digested skull fragments and several vertebrae. Since what’s left of the remaining vertebrae do not appear to be cervicals, it appears that the shark took several bites from different parts of the mosasaur and then regurgitated the indigestible pieces all at the same time. Note the way that the mosasaur’s teeth have been dissolved away from the jaw fragments and the remaining pterygoid.
t-muzzle.jpg (4017 bytes) The severed and partially digested muzzle of a small mosasaur. (3) This picture shows upper and lower views of a fragment from the anterior end (muzzle) of the skull of a small mosasaur that met a rather quick end. The specimen consists of most of the premaxillary bone, and the anterior ends of both maxillaries. The snout was apparently severed from the rest of the skull by a shark bite across the nose that cut completely through the bones. This piece was swallowed, partially digested (note missing teeth) and regurgitated with enough flesh left on the bones to hold them together as they fell to the sea bottom. There's a story to go along with this picture.
tpremax1.jpg (2971 bytes) The last remains of five small mosasaurs. (3) These are the upper and lower view of five premaxillae from several very small mosasaur skulls that have all been partially digested. They were the only material that was found from each individual. The premaxillary appears to be the most ‘survivable’ part of a juvenile mosasaur’s skull because of the relative thickness of the bone.
tcervicl.jpg (3348 bytes) The neck of a very unlucky mosasaur. (4) These are cervical (neck) vertebrae from a medium sized mosasaur that obviously lost its head and its body somewhere along the way. Although highly eroded by acid, and with at least two of the vertebrae appearing to have been severed by a strong bite, there is no evidence of embedded teeth in this specimen. Interestingly, these vertebrae came from about the same stratigraphic level as, and about a quarter mile removed from a headless / neck-less / limb-less / tail-less series of shark scavenged mosasaur vertebrae. The odds against finding two parts of the same shark scavenged animal would be astronomical at best, but I suppose that it is possible.
t-abdom.jpg (3780 bytes) A big bite out of the middle of a large (6-7 meter) mosasaur. (5) This once was a large piece of a large mosasaur (8-9 meter). These vertebrae probably came from the lower back (abdominal). Unfortunately, there were no embedded teeth or teeth marks remaining, but the several of the vertebrae show evidence of being damaged (severed) by the shark's bite.
t-pelvic.jpg (2870 bytes) Biting below the waist.....Ouch!.....I bet that hurt!! (6) This specimen is all that remains of a portion of a mosasaur’s pelvic girdle that had been almost completely digested while inside a shark’s stomach. The vertebrae are from the hip region (pygals) or nearby caudals. There is almost no area of bone surface that has not undergone severe acid attack.
t-humer.jpg (2942 bytes) A bite sized piece from a mosasaur limb. (7) This is a single limb bone (probably a humerus) that has been badly damaged by stomach acid. There is a readily visible and quite deep cut mark from a blade-like tooth through part of the bone (arrow) which was probably made when the shark severed the limb from the mosasaur.
tcaudal1.jpg (3374 bytes) A twice bitten mosasaur tail. (8) The next specimen comes from the south end of a north bound mosasaur and represents the vertebrae at the tip of a mosasaur’s tail. In this case, the large lump is three fused vertebrae that were the result of an infection from a much earlier bite that severed the tip of the tail. The mosasaur apparently survived long enough for the wound to heal and then ended up as a meal. Larry Martin and Bruce Rothschild reported on a larger but similar specimen of fused mosasaur vertebrae several years ago. Click here for a close up of the fused vertebrae.
tcaudal2.jpg (4793 bytes) Nibbling at the tail.....several small bites from the same mosasaur (9) These caudal vertebrae also ended up inside a shark as a meal. Based on the fact that the several ends of the vertebrae were partially dissolved by acid, it appears that the mosasaur’s tail was actually taken in several smaller bites.
tcaudal3.jpg (3954 bytes) Another bite sized morsel of mosasaur tail. (10) This was my first shark / mosasaur find for 1998......a short (bite-sized) series of four caudal partially digested prior to fossilization.
RECENT REFERENCES:
Shimada, K. 2008. Ontogenetic parameters and life history strategies of the Late Cretaceous lamniform shark, Cretoxyrhina mantelli, based on vertebral growth increments. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28(1):21-33.
OTHER WEB PAGES:
Kansas Sharks - Cretaceous shark remains, mostly teeth, from Kansas
The discovery of a giant Ginsu Shark - The remains of a 7 meter shark found in the Smoky Hill Chalk.
Cretoxyrhina mantelli - The Ginsu Shark - The discovery of mosasaur remains scavenged by two species of sharks.
Cretoxyrhina mantelli and Squalicorax falcatus - Here are some pictures of the teeth of these sharks.
A Moment in Time - Another example of Cretoxyrhina mantelli feeding on a mosasaur.
One Day in the Western Interior Sea..... Life could be very short for the unwary.
One Day in the Life of a Mosasaur - Being the top predator is a lot of hard work!
hosted_nvt.gif (2101 bytes)
BAC
and here..
dinostarfamily.com/shop/index.php?main_page=popup_image&pID=193or here
smu.edu/smunews/dallasaurus/mcmillan.aspFortunately, fossilized skin samples from other mosasaurs were able to serve as a guide in depicting a smooth, almost rectangular scale pattern (much like a modern day Iguana). After completion of the final skin detail, the head, body and tail went into the oven again this time as a complete piece. The legs were baked separately. (yes, in my oven)!