|
Post by crankydinosaur on Aug 13, 2009 5:56:52 GMT
i'm really hoping for a brontotherium of some sort. it's really weird one hasn't been produced in a large scale since they are kind of the token creature for the oligocene.
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Aug 13, 2009 13:10:29 GMT
i'm really hoping for a brontotherium of some sort. it's really weird one hasn't been produced in a large scale since they are kind of the token creature for the oligocene. Especially considering that their extinction marks the end of the Eocene in North America (this has been established for about 20 years now--they are not found beyond the Chadronian). But they are a very common museum piece in North American museums, often because their fossils are very common.
|
|
|
Post by Megaraptor on Aug 19, 2009 20:45:12 GMT
Carnegie Cryolophosaurus is due for next year. Let's hope it's better than Procon's or we're all in trouble!
|
|
|
Post by Megaraptor on Aug 19, 2009 20:47:10 GMT
i'm really hoping for a brontotherium of some sort. it's really weird one hasn't been produced in a large scale since they are kind of the token creature for the oligocene. GO BRONTO(therium, not saurus) I think i'll custom sculpt one once I figure out how.
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on Aug 19, 2009 21:44:53 GMT
i'm really hoping for a brontotherium of some sort. it's really weird one hasn't been produced in a large scale since they are kind of the token creature for the oligocene. GO BRONTO(therium, not saurus) I think i'll custom sculpt one once I figure out how. I thought this tread was about animals before the Dinosaurs? Brontotherium and the Oligocene come after the dinosaurs!
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Aug 20, 2009 1:48:38 GMT
What's everybody's opinion on the kaiyodo pterygotus?
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Aug 20, 2009 2:33:33 GMT
Cordy, that's the s7 one and not the s2 one, right? I personally love it, but having no knowledge of eurypterids I'm not one to judge haha.
|
|
|
Post by [][][]cordylus[][][] on Aug 20, 2009 2:55:30 GMT
Yep. I have one, and I like it. Just wondering what others think.
|
|
|
Post by kuni on Aug 20, 2009 6:31:09 GMT
It's nice, slightly better than the older s2 Eurypterus. Easier to get, too
|
|
|
Post by tomhet on Aug 20, 2009 7:15:59 GMT
I love it, it's indeed more detailed than the Eurypterus. As far as I'm concerned, it's completely based on the official reconstructions.
|
|
|
Post by crankydinosaur on Sept 7, 2009 9:11:31 GMT
I think the Eurypterus is beautiful, I just wish it was bigger but I guess none of those figures are very big... Speaking of paleozoic critters... stoneage brings up a good point that I thought the figures were going to be before the dinos - not that I don't wanna see more prehistoric mammals or birds but I would love to have a big eurypterus or an eryops! So when are these coming out because I've been going to the safari site and Randy's site waiting for news crankydinosaur
|
|
|
Post by Gorgonopsid on Sept 8, 2009 1:56:46 GMT
This before the dinosaurs thread. Not mammals.
|
|
|
Post by crankydinosaur on Sept 8, 2009 2:13:43 GMT
This before the dinosaurs thread. Not mammals. just trying to keep the thread on track officer
|
|
|
Post by kuni on Sept 8, 2009 2:19:38 GMT
Just Say NO to mammals! They're boring anyways...
|
|
|
Post by sepp on Sept 8, 2009 2:29:25 GMT
This before the dinosaurs thread. Not mammals. there were mammals before the dinosaurs, in the triassic
|
|
|
Post by kuni on Sept 8, 2009 2:33:01 GMT
OK then. Triassic mammals only!
|
|
|
Post by crankydinosaur on Sept 8, 2009 4:11:53 GMT
wouldn't they technically be call mammaliaformes?
|
|
|
Post by sepp on Sept 8, 2009 4:59:24 GMT
wouldn't they technically be call mammaliaformes? technically correct: the best kind of correct ;D
|
|
|
Post by Megaraptor on Sept 8, 2009 5:13:42 GMT
Technichally this and scientifically correct that! I miss Invicta and Marx....
|
|
|
Post by tomhet on Sept 8, 2009 5:16:47 GMT
Ironic, they were supposed to be scientifically correct at the time ;D
|
|