|
Post by wheezy on Jan 24, 2009 10:05:14 GMT
Actually i think i found them on ebay, it was simply called dinosaurs magazine believe it or not. I may bid on them but shipping is a whopping $20 so i don't know. They were geared more toward kids and there were i think 67 issues.
|
|
|
Post by sepp on Jan 24, 2009 11:10:45 GMT
^ ah, I think that's it! and yeah, I was in grade-middle school I think, when I had the subscription. that sounds right!
|
|
|
Post by Dinotoyforum on Jan 24, 2009 11:57:36 GMT
'Dinosaurs!' magazine was released In the UK too. Each issue came with part of a rex skeleton, then, eventually, bits of skin! And then, 'Swap It' dinosaur cards, I have the whole set several times if anyone is interested!?
|
|
|
Post by Dinotoyforum on Jan 24, 2009 12:27:52 GMT
It's not that it's so good - It's just that here is something more wholesome about a magazine compared to a toy. Some of the articles I find disappointing, the quality varies and there are often too many artists restorations and not enough photos of actual fossils. Just my opinion though. I can totally see how the mag would fall to pieces - I feel like I have to be careful with it as soon as I take it out the envelope, the cover is made of the same paper as the rest of the pages and because the mag is quite chunky it feels like it is going to come away. I really should get around to sending my plesiosaur article to Mike by the way. And maybe send an ad for our forum or a request for toy reviews for our blog. Maybe?
|
|
|
Post by Blade-of-the-Moon on Jan 24, 2009 12:40:43 GMT
I haven't received the new issue yet..but I got the 4th class...maybe I need to renew my subscription...Mike needs to stamp thate final issue with a big red stamp that says : " FINAL ISSUE " ...maybe I'd remember then..lol
|
|
|
Post by tomhet on Jan 24, 2009 18:03:56 GMT
It's not that it's so good - It's just that here is something more wholesome about a magazine compared to a toy. Some of the articles I find disappointing, the quality varies and there are often too many artists restorations and not enough photos of actual fossils. Just my opinion though. I can totally see how the mag would fall to pieces - I feel like I have to be careful with it as soon as I take it out the envelope, the cover is made of the same paper as the rest of the pages and because the mag is quite chunky it feels like it is going to come away. I really should get around to sending my plesiosaur article to Mike by the way. And maybe send an ad for our forum or a request for toy reviews for our blog. Maybe? The ad is a good idea methinks
|
|
|
Post by Dinotoyforum on Jan 24, 2009 18:17:49 GMT
Unbeknownst to me, I'm also mentioned in this issue of PT! My artwork is mentioned in the Scelidosaurus article by Beeson - that was a nice surprise!
---
I'll put an ad together then.
|
|
|
Post by bokisaurus on Jan 26, 2009 23:21:04 GMT
Unbeknownst to me, I'm also mentioned in this issue of PT! My artwork is mentioned in the Scelidosaurus article by Beeson - that was a nice surprise! --- I'll put an ad together then. Yay, you and me both mentioned on the same issue ;D I have not seen or read your depiction of the new scelidosaurus; so what is your take on the new Procon figure? Is it accurate? I read that the spikes were thought to actually belong on the shoulders like the new figure shows. I would be interested in your opinion. Have you meet Anthony Beeson in person? Maybe you can suggest some species to him for procon to make Unfortunately my personal Salvat photos did not make it in the issue It is rather ironic that Randy did not use them when he complemented my collection photos Maybe my photos were just a bit "staged", more studio look than rather than collection display Oh well, him mentioning me spiked up the Collectors Quest page visitation so I'm happy ;D
|
|
|
Post by bokisaurus on Jan 26, 2009 23:43:45 GMT
On this issue, Randy mentioned a very rare Bullyland figure, a Procynosuchus. Does anyone have this figure or have seen it? If you have one, can you share a picture of it? I'm really curious to see what this critter looks like. Hmm, maybe sbell you have one?
|
|
|
Post by giganotoigauana on Jan 27, 2009 0:04:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Jan 27, 2009 0:12:00 GMT
: (______________________________) (that was my jaw hitting the floor)
Oh my gosh, I absolutely need one of those, its absolutely incredible!
|
|
|
Post by stoneage on Jan 27, 2009 0:36:11 GMT
When was that made DinoObcessed and what can you tell us about it?
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Jan 27, 2009 0:41:57 GMT
It's not hers, it's Darren Naish's.
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Jan 27, 2009 2:38:10 GMT
Randy Knol mentions it in this month's PT--the Procynosuchus was a special product for the Stutgaart museum.
Doesn't say when they were available though--maybe they are still there--anyone from Germany, or nearby, that can find out?
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jan 27, 2009 22:58:12 GMT
So, I am happy to say that the new PT issue is out (at least, it has reached my mail box, so it must be out now). Anyway, for those who don't yet have it, I can proudly point to the front page at the first headline--Largest T.rex discovered! This is referring to the skeleton of Scotty, who I mentioned earlier as have a femur that measure significantly larger than any known tyrannosaur, and possibly any carcharodontid. The article is not credited, but it was co-written by Phil Currie and Lara Shychoski (maybe others--there are a lot of people working on it). Anyway, there it is in writing--not a research paper, but written in the record that Scotty is a big, old T rex. There is also an ad for our upcoming conference. It will be discussing research on late Cretaceous terrestrial faunas (enthusiasts are welcome as well--still have to pay though). The website ( dinocountry.com/?s=263&p=263&0=263) is way too wordy, but does say more about it. how big?
|
|
|
Post by sbell on Jan 28, 2009 0:15:53 GMT
So, I am happy to say that the new PT issue is out (at least, it has reached my mail box, so it must be out now). Anyway, for those who don't yet have it, I can proudly point to the front page at the first headline--Largest T.rex discovered! This is referring to the skeleton of Scotty, who I mentioned earlier as have a femur that measure significantly larger than any known tyrannosaur, and possibly any carcharodontid. The article is not credited, but it was co-written by Phil Currie and Lara Shychoski (maybe others--there are a lot of people working on it). Anyway, there it is in writing--not a research paper, but written in the record that Scotty is a big, old T rex. There is also an ad for our upcoming conference. It will be discussing research on late Cretaceous terrestrial faunas (enthusiasts are welcome as well--still have to pay though). The website ( dinocountry.com/?s=263&p=263&0=263) is way too wordy, but does say more about it. how big? I don't really know--that will be out when Phil publishes. But apparently it is quite appreciable, in terms of overall mass (in length, Scotty is shorter--his skull is quite high and boxy, compared to the skulls of many rexes).
|
|
|
Post by bokisaurus on Jan 28, 2009 2:26:02 GMT
: (______________________________) (that was my jaw hitting the floor) Oh my gosh, I absolutely need one of those, its absolutely incredible! LOL ;D same here, I am still looking for pieces of my lower jaw ;D ;D ;D I want that little figure! I should have never asked for a photo of it! Well, it make me feel better to know that so far, the two likeliest members to have it ( Dino and sbell, knowing how biy your collections are!) don't So Theri, the hunt for it is on? ;D
|
|
|
Post by tomhet on Jan 28, 2009 3:17:05 GMT
Count me in
|
|
|
Post by therizinosaurus on Jan 28, 2009 3:54:09 GMT
Yeah!
Is anyone on the forum German? I know there are some other Europeans, but I can't remember specifically...
|
|
|
Post by Ajax on Jan 28, 2009 4:13:00 GMT
Yeah! Is anyone on the forum German? I know there are some other Europeans, but I can't remember specifically... I'm a German descendant (dads side) but also half dutch as my mother was born in Holland. ;D
|
|